THE SOLAR SYSTEM, A GIGANTIC ATOM!

Premise: As presented in the Unipole Field Theory section the logical assertion is that the Earth is indeed a unipole rather than a dipole. Should this be the case then we would have to make the leap of faith that the Sun would act like a positive nucleus of an atom whereas the planets would be but electrons circling same. Preposterous, you say, perhaps.

Theoretical premise: Should we continue to consider that gravitational forces are strange and mysterious when in fact it could represent no more than magnetic attraction. Electrons remain in orbit around the nucleus as a result of centrifugal forces equalizing the attractive forces between the positive nucleus and the negative electrons. Too simple to believe, perhaps. However, I recommend that the following protocol be implemented which would ascertain whether this premise is folly or plausible.

1. Assuming the Sun is in fact a positively charged particle, calculate the attractive force its mass would exert upon particles orbiting at the planetary orbits. Of course this must assume that the mass of the Sun or planets are related to the positive or negative attractive forces. Perhaps we should also consider the rotational speed of the sun and planetary bodies and presume that their rotational speeds could have a direct relationship upon their respective magnetic fields.

2. Utilizing the masses of the planets calculate the attractive force and then calculate the speed at which it must rotate around the Sun to maintain its orbit without being pulled into the Sun.

3. Employ a comparative graphical representation of your calculations and then determine whether the premise is folly or plausible.

4. If these parameters are enough to entice you to delve into your computers I applaud you for your imagination and foresight.

Conclusion: As it has become apparent this section asks many more questions than it even begins to answer and should you have the time, energy and inquisitive mind I would appreciate receiving your graphs and calculations to determine whether we have delved into folly or fact.

Off the Deep End: If you have come this far we might as well go for the Gold. Should the premise of this section be factual then antigravity is but the next step and please move on to the next section entitled, Antigravity, folly or fact.

Antigravity
Gravity ???
Simulated Unipole Motor/Generator
Perception of Matter
Multideminsional Thoughts
Astronomical Travel
Perception of Matter
Multideminsional Thoughts
Astronomical Travel